Murray v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1ConcurrenceStuart, Justice
I concur -with this Court’s decision to quash the writ of certiorari. I write to explain my reasoning.
In April 2013, Louis Murray filed his fifth Rule 32, Ala. R.Crim. P., petition for postconviction relief, attacking his sentence for his 1983 conviction for first-degree robbery, which had been enhanced pursuant to the Habitual Felony Offender Act, § 13A-5-9, Ala.Code 1975, in light of the State’s proof that Murray had three prior felony convictions, to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. In his Rule 32 petition, Murray alleged, among other grounds, that his sentence was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- IMED Corp. v. Systems Engineering Assoc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. NielsenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
- DeKalb County LP Gas Co., Inc. v. Suburban Gas, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1998
- Hogan v. HartwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- Harrison v. WigingtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.