Legal Opinion

Hogan v. Hartwell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 7, 1942No. 1 Div. 166PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Chief Justice.

Appellant, a qualified elector of the City of Mobile, instituted this contest of the election of Harry T. Hartwell to the office of Commissioner of said city for the term beginning October 1, 1941. The contest is based upon two grounds: First, it is insisted that Hartwell, at the time of the election, was ineligible to hold the office by reason of his conviction in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama on May 11, 1939, of an offense punishable by imprisonment in the penitentiary and in the second place the contention is that said Hartwell…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Shaw v. City CouncilSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  3. Shepherd v. SartainSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  4. Finklea v. FarishSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  5. State Ex Rel. Cloud v. State Election BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Keenan v. McGuaneIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Randolph County v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  3. Mason v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1956
  4. Guastello v. Department of Liquor ControlSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  5. State Ex Rel. Sokira v. BurrSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API