Emerald Aero, LLC v. Kaplan
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HALLER, J.
—Stephen Kaplan appeals from a judgment confirming a $30 million arbitration award against him. Although the award does not specify the nature of the damages, the parties agree a substantial portion of the award consists of punitive damages. The arbitrator issued the award after a hearing which Kaplan elected not to attend. We conclude the judgment must be reversed. The arbitrator exceeded his authority by awarding punitive damages without adequate prior notice to Kaplan, in violation of the parties’ arbitration agreement and fundamental procedural fairness principles.
OVERVIEW
2Cases cited29 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Vons Companies, Inc. v. Seabest Foods, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996
- Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. Intel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Haworth v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cohen v. TNP 2008 Participating Notes Program, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Kelly v. Charles Schwab & Co. CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Kim v. PCP-Sundance CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Lew-Williams v. PetrosianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
- Park Medical PharmacyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.