Rachal v. Rachal
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Concurrence
REILLY, Chief Judge, Retired,
concurring:
In joining in Judge Terry’s opinion, I should like to make an additional comment on the legal fee issue. The authority of a court to require one party in a divorce action to pay counsel fees incurred by the other spouse derives entirely from statute, as such awards are at odds with the so-called American rule, which makes each litigant in a civil action, irrespective of the outcome of the case, shoulder the burden of paying his own lawyer. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness Society, 421 U.S. 240, 95 S.Ct. 1612, 44 L.Ed.2d 141 (1975); see also In…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- In Re Antioch UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Payton v. PaytonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963
- Gullo v. HirstDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1965
- Majette v. MajetteDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.