Legal Opinion

Laird v. Town of Montezuma

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 12, 1993PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and judgment granted in accordance with the following Memorandum: The Town of Montezuma amended its zoning ordinance to establish new boundary lines for the hamlet district. Petitioners, owners of property formerly within the hamlet district, sought judgment declaring the amendment null and void.

Supreme Court properly denied relief to petitioners. The legislative determination that the amendment was necessary to reflect existing conditions and to avoid future congestion within the hamlet district is entitled to a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Parkview Associates v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Kovarsky v. Housing & Development AdministrationNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Asian Americans for Equality v. KochNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Webster Associates v. Town of WebsterNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Kravetz v. PlengeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Byer v. Town of PoestenkillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. Krieger v. City of RochesterNew York Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Brown v. WingNew York Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Matter of Troy Sand & Gravel Co., Inc. v. FlemingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  5. Coaxum v. New York State Board of ParoleNew York Supreme Court · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API