Legal Opinion

Boltz v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 30, 1937No. Appeal, 197PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Parker, J.,

The plaintiff, Clara W. Boltz, brought this action to recover the face of a policy of life insurance issued by defendant and recovered a verdict for the amount of installments due when the action was begun. Judgment was entered for the plaintiff on the verdict and defendant has appealed, assigning as error the refusal of its motion for judgment n. o. v.

On trial the plaintiff made out a prima facie case and defendant then offered proofs tending to show that the insured, in his written application for the insurance, had knowingly made false and fraudulent answers to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Nanty-Glo Boro. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Evans v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. N.Y. Life Ins. Co. v. Brandwene Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Suravitz v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  5. Livingood v. New York Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bailey v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Reeder v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Glaser v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Kasmer v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Anastasio v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API