Boltz v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Parker, J.,
The plaintiff, Clara W. Boltz, brought this action to recover the face of a policy of life insurance issued by defendant and recovered a verdict for the amount of installments due when the action was begun. Judgment was entered for the plaintiff on the verdict and defendant has appealed, assigning as error the refusal of its motion for judgment n. o. v.
On trial the plaintiff made out a prima facie case and defendant then offered proofs tending to show that the insured, in his written application for the insurance, had knowingly made false and fraudulent answers to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Nanty-Glo Boro. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Evans v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- N.Y. Life Ins. Co. v. Brandwene Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Suravitz v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- Livingood v. New York Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bailey v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Reeder v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Glaser v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Kasmer v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Anastasio v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.