Legal Opinion
United States v. Ramos-Oseguera
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 30, 1997No. Nos. 95-10386, 95-10478, 95-10535, 95-10491 and 95-10498PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge:
Julio Ramos-Oseguera (Ramos) and Sote-ro Ramos-Oseguera (Sotero) were convicted of a conspiracy to sell heroin in addition to many individual counts of heroin sales. Ramos was also convicted of Continuing Criminal Enterprise (CCE). At that same trial, Roberto Ramirez (Ramirez) was convicted of a single count of possession of heroin with intent to sell, and Samuel Robles-Lopez (Robles) was convicted of two counts of possessing and distributing heroin. Ramirez and Robles were both acquitted of the conspiracy charge.
Prior to the Ramos trial, Ramos’s wife, Maria…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Florida v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- United States v. Kayle NordbyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. McCollumCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
- United States v. CaseresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. David Vernon TankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John Lee McLAUGHLIN, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.