Legal Opinion

Faber v. State

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 31, 1960No. 18700PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

Grace Faber and Bert Faber, to whom we will refer *241as plaintiffs, filed an action against defendants, the State of Colorado and the Department of Highways, in which they sought to recover damages for alleged tortious acts.

The attorney general, on behalf of defendants, filed a motion to dismiss the action. The motion set forth two grounds, viz: (1) The statute of limitations; and (2). “That these defendants are immune from liability in tort, * * The trial court sustained the second ground of the motion to dismiss and entered judgment accordingly. Plaintiffs are before this court on writ of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ace Flying Service, Inc. v. Colorado Department of AgricultureSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  2. Maffei v. Incoporated Town of KemmererWyoming Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Colorado Racing Commission v. Brush Racing Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  4. Jerauld County v. Saint Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Boxberger v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Evans v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
  2. City of Colorado Springs v. ConnersSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  3. State Ex Rel. Colorado State Claims Board of the Division of Risk Management v. DeFoorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  4. People v. HedrickSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  5. Aztec Minerals Corp. v. RomerColorado Court of Appeals · 1996

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API