Legal Opinion

State v. Valstad

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 24, 1969No. 41181PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nelson, Justice.

Appeal from a judgment of conviction of possessing burglary tools, proscribed by Minn. St. 609.59, which provides:

“Whoever has in his possession any device, explosive, or other instrumentality with intent to use or permit the use of the same to commit burglary may be sentenced to' imprisonment for not more than three years or to payment of a fine of not more than $3,000, or both.”

On March 17,1967, Patrolman Wallace Cecil, Minneapolis Police Department, talked to Third Precinct Officer Bridgeman, who said that on the previous evening his partner and he had received a call to go…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Preston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. ClomanOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  2. City of St. Paul v. VaughnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  3. Thoreson v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Palmore v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. State v. ConawaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API