Bank of Neelyville v. Lee

A companion case to this was here and the opinion therein is reported in 182 Mo. App. 185, 168 S. W. 796. What we there sug*538gested (p. 192) might have been involved, bnt was not, and that which we expressly stated we did not decide evidently lead to a' belief in behalf of plaintiff that if that question were involved it should be decided in its favor. We referred' in that opinion to the ques-' tion as to- whether if a note signed by more than one as maker, yet as a matter of fact some or one of-the parties signed as surety, under the Negotiablé Instrument Law (sections 10161 and 10089, Revised…