Legal Opinion

Bank of Neelyville v. Lee

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 23, 1917PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Butler County Circuit Court. — Ho». J. P. Foard, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtSturgis, J.

This is a. suit on a promissory note for $363.05 executed’ to defendant Loury by the other defendants and by him endorsed to the plaintiff bank. It is a companion case to those of Bank v. Lee et al., 182 Mo. App. 185, 168 S. W. 796 and Bank v. Lee, 193 Mo. App. 537, 182 S. W. 1016, and grows out of much the same facts. Each of said suits, however, is on different notes.

It is conceded that these notes were given for the benefit of Lee, who was in fact borrowing the money from the plaintiff bank. There is no question as to Lee’s liability and here, as in the other eases, the other defendants…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hobbs v. BoatrightSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  2. Barnes v. Century Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  3. People's Saving Bank v. HughesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. West v. BrisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
  5. Daviess County Savings Ass'n v. SailorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Portland Morris Plan Bank v. WincklerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1928
  2. Bank of Amsterdam v. WelliverMissouri Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. Bank of Mountain View v. McMinds and StevensonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1921
  4. Maier v. Wallace and CookMissouri Court of Appeals · 1922
  5. Louis Pizitz Dry Goods Co. v. New York Hamilton Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API