Hincher v. HOSPITAL CARE ASSOCIATION
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
The defendant’s chief assignments of error challenge the rulings of the trial court in denying its motion for judgment as of nonsuit and in refusing to give the jury the peremptory instruction as requested by the defendant.
“Defendant’s evidence which is not at variance with plaintiff’s evidence but which tends to explain and clarify it, may be considered on motion to nonsuit.” Robbins v. Crawford, 246 N.C. 622, 99 S.E. 2d 852. See also Nance v. Hitch, 238 N.C. 1, 76 S.E. 2d 461, and cases there cited.
It is also established by our decisions that, “When the plaintiff offers evidence sufficient…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Peek v. Wachovia Bank & Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Commercial Solvents, Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Thomas-Yelverton Co. v. State Capital Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Rhodes v. RaxterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- City of Shelby v. LackeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Chisholm v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- McAdams v. Union Security Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Alexander v. Pilot Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985