R.G. v. C.f.-M.

The defendant, C.F.-M., appeals from the issuance of a harassment prevention order issued pursuant to G. L. c. 258E. She contends that her neighbor, R.G.,2 did not prove three or more acts of harassment as defined by G. L. c. 258E, § 1, inserted by St. 2010, c. 23. In addition, she asserts that she was denied procedural due process in connection with the issuance of the order. We affirm.

Discussion. 1. The order. The standard for issuance of a G. L. c. 258E harassment prevention order is "whether the judge could find, by a preponderance of the evidence, together with all permissible…