Legal Opinion

Seney v. Morhy

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 28, 2014PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtIreland, C.J.

We granted the defendant’s application for further appellate review to determine whether appeals of expired harassment protection orders issued pursuant to G. L. c. 258E should be dismissed as moot. Because we conclude that appeals of such orders should be reviewed on their merits even if the orders have expired during the pendency of the appeal, and that, here, insufficient evidence supported the issuance of a harassment prevention order against the defendant, we remand the case to the District Court for entry of an order vacating the order.

*59Background and procedure. In April, 2011, the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Aime v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  2. Frizado v. FrizadoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  3. Superintendent of Worcester State Hospital v. HagbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  4. Blake v. Massachusetts Parole BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  5. O'BRIEN v. BorowskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Van Liew v. StansfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
  2. A.T. v. C.R.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2015
  3. C. Paige Hinkson v. Stuart StevensSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020
  4. Gassman v. ReasonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2016
  5. In re F.C.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API