Legal Opinion
Cowherd v. Leidholt
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided March 13, 2020No. 5:19-cv-05027Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA WESTERN DIVISION RANDY COWHERD, 5:19-CV-05027-KES Plaintiff, vs. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S EMERGENCY MOTION FOR MIKE LEIDHOLT, SECRETARY OF PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION CORRECTIONS, Defendant. Plaintiff, Randy Cowherd, filed a pro se civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Docket 12. This court screened Cowherd’s complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and directed service. Docket 7. Cowherd moves for an emergency preliminary injunction. Docket 6. “A preliminary injunction is an extraordinary remedy[.]” Roudachevski v. All– Am. Care Ctrs., Inc.,
64…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. C L Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- George Goff v. Charles Harper, Crispus Nix, Ronald Welder, John HenryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Roudachevski v. All-American Care Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Gelco Corp. v. Coniston PartnersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Rogers v. ScurrCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.