Legal Opinion

A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 13, 1953No. 57324; protests 928441-G, etc. (New York)Published

1Opinion of the Court

*453Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

It was stipulated that the items marked “A” consist of kidskin plates similar in all material respects to those the subject of Kung Chen Fur Corpn. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480); that the items marked “D” consist of dogskins the same as those involved in S. M. Brachman & Co. et al. v. United States (5 Cust. Ct. 153, C. D. 389); and that the items marked “G” consist of goatskins the same as those involved in United States v. Winograd Bros., Inc. (32 C. C. P. A. 153, C. A. D. 302). Accepting this stipulation as a statement of fact and following the cited…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kung Chen Fur Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  2. S. M. Brachman & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API