Legal Opinion

S. M. Brachman & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 25, 1940No. C. D. 389PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bkown, Judge:

This suit against the United States was brought at New York to recover customs duties claimed to have been illegally collected on certain dogskins imported from China in the period 1930 to 1936.

The collector of customs took duty at 25 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1519 (a) of the Tariff Act of 1930. Said paragraph reads as follows:

Par. 1519. (a) Dressed furs and dressed fur skins (except silver or black fox), and plates, mats, linings, strips, and crosses of dressed dog, goat, or kid skins, 25 per centum ad valorem; all the foregoing, if dyed, 30 per centum ad valorem.(b)…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Arnhold & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1938

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  2. Chase National Bank v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
  3. Protest 36425-K of Jos. Rotberg Co.United States Customs Court · 1941
  4. Protest 36440-K of Melchers, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1941
  5. Protest 47754-G of Amtorg Trading Corp.United States Customs Court · 1941

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API