Legal Opinion
Koepke v. Bilnor Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 26, 1968PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAnthony M. Livoti, J.
The plaintiff opposes the motion of defendant Goshen Manufacturing Co. (hereinafter “Goshen ”), to confirm the report of Honorable Samuel S. Tripp, the Special Referee of this court dated November 22, 1967, recommending the granting of its CPLR 3211 (subd. [a], par. 8) motion to dismiss the action against it for lack of jurisdiction.
It is urged on plaintiff’s behalf that this defendant was amenable to jurisdiction under CPLR 301 and 302 (subd. [a], *930pars. 1, 2, 3, els. [i], [ii]), and that, on the authority of Pilagno v. Staiber (53 Misc 2d 858) it was properly served with process. Plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Gillmore v. J. S. Inskip, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1967
- Stewart v. Transcontinental Car Forwarding Co.New York Supreme Court · 1938
- Vassallo v. SlominAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Stewart v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- P.M.S., Inc. v. JakubowskiIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Potter v. BennettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- Newman v. G. D. Searle & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- P.M.S., Inc. v. JakubowskiIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992