Legal Opinion

Gillmore v. J. S. Inskip, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1967PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBernard S. Meyer, J.

This motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction over the person of defendants Aston Martin Lagonda, Limited and Aston Martin Lagonda, Incorporated, raises issues concerning the constitutionality, retroactivity and interpretation of GPLR 302 (subd. [a], par. 3), as amended by chapter 590 of the Laws of 1966, effective September 1, 1966. The motion is denied without prejudice to assertion of the same defense in defendants’ answer or answers.

Limited is a corporation, organized under the laws of Great Britain, which manufactures Aston Martin automobiles. Corporation is a corporation, organized…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Erl Anger Mills, Inc. v. Cohoes Fibre Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
  4. Lewin v. Bock Laundry Machine Co.New York Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Newman v. Charles S. Nathan, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Ronar, Inc. v. WallaceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
  2. Allen v. Auto Specialties Mfg. Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  3. Martinez v. American StandardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. Trafalgar Capital Corp. v. Oil Producers Equipment Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
  5. Stark Carpet Corporation v. M-Geough Robinson, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API