Legal Opinion

Fischer v. Pinske

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 18, 1976No. 46084PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant, a manufacturer of prefinished wood cabinets, appeals from a judgment awarding plaintiff, a manufacturer’s sales representative, damages equal to 11 months of net sales commissions for breach of a written contract provision requiring defendant to give 1 year’s notice of cancellation. The issue for review is the trial court’s determination that the parties by their conduct waived a provision of their original written contract, “for a trial period of six (6) months,” which provided that at the end of that period the parties might renew that contract for 1 year by an additional writing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Edelstein v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  2. Eberhart v. EberhartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  3. Malmquist v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bolander v. BolanderCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
  2. Cherne Contracting Corp. v. Marathon Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  3. Dayton Development Company, a Minnesota Corporation v. Gilman Financial Services, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  4. House v. BaxterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Nutrisoya Foods, Inc. v. SUNRICH LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API