Legal Opinion

House v. Baxter

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 9, 1985No. CX-84-2217PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SEDGWICK, Judge.

This appeal is from a judgment which determined that an employment agreement expired November 30, 1981, and that an implied contract existed which required the partners of an accounting firm to have just cause before discharging another partner. We reverse in part and remand.

FACTS

Appellant Stillman, House, Swanson & Co., Ltd. is a professional corporation en gaged in the practice of accounting in Duluth. Appellants C.K. Baxter, D. Svendsen and A.F. Swanson, and respondent Charles House each own shares of the corporation and serve as its officers and directors.

Several…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cederstrand v. Lutheran BrotherhoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  2. Borne Chemical Co. v. DictrowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  3. Evans v. BlesiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Fenno v. Jacobe, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1983
  5. Fischer v. PinskeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bolander v. BolanderCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
  2. Cherne Contracting Corp. v. Marathon Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  3. SL Montevideo Technology, Inc. v. Eaton Aerospace, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2003
  4. Bolander v. BolanderCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
  5. Cherne Contracting Corp. v. Marathon Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API