Legal Opinion

Hotetz v. Hotetz

New York City Family Court

Decided June 19, 1969PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtElizabeth Bass Golding, J.

This proceeding was instituted in the Superior Court, County of Los Angeles, State of California, pursuant to the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act, for the purpose of obtaining an order, requiring the respondent to support his wife, Carmen Hotetz, and two minor children, Charles Hotetz and Jean Hotetz; to reimburse the County of Los Angeles for expenditures for the support of the said dependents of the respondent.

The petition alleges that the parties were married at New York, New York, on or about September 17, 1950, and were separated at New York, New York, on or about April,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mirizio v. MirizioNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. In Re Proving the Will of DaggettNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. County of Santa Clara, State of California v. HughesNew York City Family Court · 1964
  4. Fernandez v. FernandezNew York City Family Court · 1966

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gemmiti v. BeagleNew York City Family Court · 1978
  2. Post v. MooreNew York Family Court · 1979
  3. Martin v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. Jane S. D. v. Francis X. D.New York Family Court · 1981
  5. Campas v. CampasNew York Family Court · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API