Legal Opinion

County of Santa Clara, State of California v. Hughes

New York City Family Court

Decided July 6, 1964PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHugh R. Elwyn, J.

In this proceeding, initiated in the State of California under the Uniform Eeciprocal Enforcement of Support Act of California (California Code of Civil Procedure, §§ 1650-1690), the petitioner, the County of Santa Clara, seeks a judgment against respondent ordering him to pay the sum of $3,256 as reimbursement for expenditures for the support of the respondent’s dependents, and the petitioner, Dolly Claretta Hughes, asks that the respondent, styled the defendant in the California proceeding, be ordered to pay the sum of $100 per month for the support of two minor children who are in the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Krause v. KrauseNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Laumeier v. . LaumeierNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  3. Zirkle v. ZirkleIndiana Supreme Court · 1930
  4. "Lola Almandares" v. "Diego Almandares"New York Family Court · 1946
  5. Kane v. KaneMichigan Supreme Court · 1927

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Vecellio v. VecellioDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  3. Martin v. MartinNew York City Family Court · 1968
  4. Shinouda v. ShinoudaNew York Family Court · 1978
  5. Gemmiti v. BeagleNew York City Family Court · 1978

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API