Legal Opinion

In the Interest of Doe

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided December 22, 1999No. 21876PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

ACOBA, J.

We hold that the family court may not adjudicate a minor in criminal contempt for violating a court order unless it had previously informed the minor of the nature of a contempt of court charge and the consequences of being found in contempt. Minor-Appellant Jane Doe (Doe) was not so informed by the family court of the first circuit (the court)1 in this case, and therefore, should not have been adjudged in criminal contempt of the court. While as a general matter the family court may find a minor in contempt of court, we further hold that a status offender,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Beech Aircraft Corp. v. RaineySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Michael G. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. L. A. M. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Interest of D.L.D. v. Circuit Court for Crawford CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. BrownHawaii Supreme Court · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In the Interest of DoeHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  2. In the Interest of DoeHawaii Supreme Court · 2005
  3. In re Jennifer G.New York City Family Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API