Legal Opinion

In the Interest of Doe

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 2001No. 21876PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

NAKAYAMA, J.

We granted the application for a writ of certiorari, filed by petitioner-appellee State of Hawai’i (the prosecution), in order to review the published opinion of the Intermediate Court of Appeals (ICA), In re Jane Doe, 95 Hawai'i 340, 22 P.3d 987 (1999), wherein the ICA reversed the July 1, 1998 findings, order, and decree of the family court of the first circuit finding respondent-appellant Jane Doe (Doe) in criminal contempt for violating a order of protective supervision issued by the family court. The ICA ruled that Doe received insufficient notice of…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. United States Ex Rel. Attorney General of the United States v. Delaware & Hudson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Ex Parte RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  5. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. JessHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. KekuewaHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  3. In the Interest of DoeHawaii Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. Guyton.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2015
  5. In Re DoeHawaii Supreme Court · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API