Legal Opinion

In Re Moore

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 6, 1997No. 97-BG-612PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The Board of Professional Responsibility (“the Board”) has recommended that Howard D. Moore be disbarred. Bar Counsel has informed the court that it takes no exception to the Board’s report and recommendation; respondent has filed neither an exception nor a brief. We adopt the Board’s recommendation.

Charges against respondent stem from his misappropriation of funds entrusted to him by a client, his repeated invasion of his client escrow account to pay general business and other expenses, and his failure to cooperate with the subsequent investigation by Bar Counsel. Moore was charged with…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. In Re MicheelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Matter of ShorterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. In Re PiersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. In Re HesslerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re MitchellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. In re AhaghotuDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. In Re GregoryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. In Re MitranoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. In re MooreDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API