Legal Opinion

In re Moore

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 29, 1999No. 97-BG-1793PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Respondent, disbarred in late 1997 for misappropriation of funds, In re Moore, 704 A.2d 1187 (D.C.1997), again appears before this court for ethical violations. The Board on Professional Responsibility recommends that no further sanctions be taken against respondent in light of his current disbarment. No exceptions have been filed by either Bar Counsel or respondent. We adopt the Board’s recommendation.

Bar Counsel charged respondent with numerous ethical violations, including commingling and misappropriation (Rule 1.15(a)), failure to pay third party funds (Rule 1.15(b)), failure to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. In Re MooreDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. In Re HerndonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re JacksonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API