Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Norman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 6, 1940No. 32,522PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 295 N.W. 63. The appeal is from a judgment entered pursuant to findings made by the court. As the issue presented is one of fact, it is necessary that these be rather fully stated:

Christian L. and Helen Norman were husband and wife. They were not blessed with "any child or children" of their own. "Between May 20 and June 23, 1895," they "received into their care and custody from some undisclosed * * * source a strange child to rear * * * 10 to 15 days old." There is nothing in the way of proof as to "the origin of the child," nor that it was "of kin to the Normans." On June 23,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re Trust Under Will of HoldenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  2. Fiske v. LawtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  3. Sorenson v. RasmussenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  4. Laird v. VilaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  5. McKeown v. ArgetsingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Cavanaugh v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. People v. ParrisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971
  3. First National Bank of Denver v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  4. In Re Estate of BoutelleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  5. United Services Automobile Ass'n v. GambinoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API