Legal Opinion
In Re Estate of Boutelle
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 14, 1944No. 33,765PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 15 N.W.2d 506. This appeal is from an order denying appellants' alternative motion for amended findings or a new trial.
Appellants are trustees of the trust created under the will of Mortimer Hayes Boutelle. Respondents, Harriett M. Renshaw and A.H. David, are respectively the executrix and her attorney, testator having, under paragraph 12 of his will, directed:
"I designate and appoint Harriett M. Renshaw as the sole executrix of my estate, and that she shall qualify as such executrix without the requirement of bond. I request that such executrix shall appoint my associate,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Edwards v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Eaton v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- In Re Trust Under Will of HoldenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- In Re Trusteeship Created Under Will of OrdeanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- In re the Estate of BarrettNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Trust Under Will of DavidsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- In Re Trust Created by Will of CrosbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- In Re Estate of BradleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Boyle v. KirbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Crosby v. AtmoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.