Legal Opinion

Hodes v. S.N.C. Achille Lauro ed Altri-Gestione

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 22, 1988No. Nos. 88-5086, 88-5092PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ROTH, District Judge.

Appellants, defendants below, contest the refusal of the district court to enforce a foreign forum selection clause contained in a cruise ship ticket, purchased by appellees, plaintiffs below, Mildred and Frank Hodes. Finding that the clause satisfies the “reasonable communicativeness” test this court set forth in Marek v. Marpan Two, Inc., 817 F.2d 242 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 155, 98 L.Ed.2d 110 (1987), and that its enforcement would not violate the principles the Supreme Court set forth in The Bremen v. Zapata OffShore Co., 407…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Carson v. American Brands, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. ShuteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Lauro Lines S.R.L. v. ChasserSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. LAURO LINES s.r.l. v. ChasserSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Magi XXI, Inc. v. Stato della Città del VaticanoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  5. Nettie Effron v. Sun Line Cruises, Inc. And Sun Line Greece Special Shipping Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API