Marek, Harriet and Marek, Samuel Husband and Wife v. Marpan Two, Inc. And Bahama Cruise Line, Inc
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
A. LEON HIGGINBOTHAM, Jr., Circuit Judge.
This appeal continues the long line of cases, going back at least as far as The Majestic, 166 U.S. 375, 17 S.Ct. 597, 41 L.Ed. 1039 (1897), involving the enforcement of contractual conditions that are invariably located deep in the fine print of cruise ship tickets. Because the ticket at issue here was reasonably communicative in giving notice of the existence and importance of, and in expressing, its limiting conditions, we will affirm the district court’s entry of summary judgment for appellees.
I
The following facts are taken from…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- The MajesticSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Murrary v. . Cunard Steamship Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Kathryn J. Shankles v. Costa Armatori, S.P.A., Isolina Vazquez GastonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Ciro Silvestri v. Italia Societa Per Azioni Di NavigazioneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Mary Lousararian v. Royal Caribbean Corp., as Successor in Interest to Royal Caribbean LimitedCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Nettie Effron v. Sun Line Cruises, Inc. And Sun Line Greece Special Shipping Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Park Inn International, L.L.C. v. Mody Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- Alberta Gas Chemicals Limited and Alberta Gas Chemicals, Incorporated v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company, Du Pont Holdings, Inc., and Conoco IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Jackson v. University of PittsburghCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.