Jefferson v. Greater Anchorage Area Borough

OPINION

Before NESBETT, C. J., and DIMOND and RABINO WITZ, JJ. NESBETT, Chief Justice.

Appellant’s amended complaint questioning the legality of a bond election held by appellee Borough was dismissed with prejudice by the trial court for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be based and on the ground that the decision of that court in Dale v. Greater Anchorage Area Borough 1 was res judicata.

Appellant’s first point on appeal is that the court’s decision in Dale is not res judi-cata with respect to the issues he attempted to raise in this case.

The facts are that the legality of the…