Legal Opinion

Dyar Sales & Machinery Co. v. Mininni

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided June 15, 1933PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.

This action, in which exceptions were noted and allowed, was assumpsit, by a corporation, on account annexed to the writ. To establish plaintiff’s main case, counsel offered in evidence the affidavit of its secretary. R. S., Chap. 96, Sec. 129.

The statute making ex parte affidavits permissible in proof is in these words:

“In all actions brought on an itemized account annexed to the writ, the affidavit of the plaintiff, made before a notary public using a seal, that the account on which the action is brought is a *81true statement of the indebtedness existing between the parties to the suit with…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mansfield v. GusheeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1921
  2. Bailey v. WorsterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1907
  3. Fishing Gazette Publishing Co. v. Beale & Gannett Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1925
  4. Sawyer v. HillgroveSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Roberts v. RobertsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
  2. Bramco Electric Corp. v. ShellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Mugerdichian v. GoudalionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1936
  4. Roberts v. RobertsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API