Legal Opinion · Dissent

Central Ceiling & Parttiton, Inc v. Department of Commerce

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 17, 2002No. Docket 225378Published

1DissentWilder, J.

I respectfully dissent. In Northern Concrete Pipe, Inc v Sinacola Cos—Midwest, Inc, 461 Mich 316, 321, 323-324; 603 NW2d 257 (1999), our Supreme Court held that the substantial compliance provision of the Construction Lien Act, MCL 570.1302(1), does not apply to the statutorily mandated ninety-day recording deadline found in MCL 570.1111(1). Because the liens asserted by Central Ceiling & Partition, Inc. (Central), Kitchen Suppliers, Inc. (KSl), and Cappy Heating and Air Conditioning, Inc. (Cappy) were not recorded within the ninety-day deadline, they ceased to exist, and the lower *448court…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. McIntireMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Oakland County Board v. Michigan Property & Casualty Guaranty Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  3. MacOmb County Prosecutor v. MurphyMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Western Michigan University Board of Control v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Etefia v. Credit Technologies, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API