Legal Opinion

McKim v. Brast

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1923PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Litz, Judge:

The petitioner, Frank McKim, as a candidate for one of the four positions of councilman for the city of Parkersburg, at a general municipal election held on the 3d day of April, 1923, seeks by mandamus to compel E. A. Brast, Thomas Logan! and Joseph M. Murphy, constituting the election board of said city, to make recount of all the ballots cast in said city election for the several candidates for city council, including petitioner.

In Chapter 3, Code, the county court is made an election board with supervision over all elections in the county or magisterial districts and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stockton v. PowellSupreme Court of Florida · 1892
  2. Trunick v. Town of NorthviewWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Duty v. ThompsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Gregory v. HubardSupreme Court of Virginia · 1918

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Wilson v. County Court of Barbour CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. State Ex Rel. Peterkin v. City Council of ParkersburgWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Alderson v. County Court of Summers CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. State v. County Court of Barbour CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API