Legal Opinion

Duty v. Thompson

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1916PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Petitiou by M. K. Duty for writ of prohibition against S. M. Thompson and others.

1Opinion of the Court

POFEENBARGER, JUDGE:

On tbe eighth day after the County Court" of Wirt County, sitting as a board of canvassers, had completed the work of canvassing the returns of the election held in that county on the 7th day of November, 1916, declared the results thereof, entered .the same upon its records, issued certificates of election in accordance therewith and adjourned sine die, R. S. Blair, a candidate for the office of State Senator, voted for .in said county at said election, made a demand upon the members of said court for a recount of the ballots as to that office. They met and ordered that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Bailey v. Supervisors of GreeneNew York Supreme Court · 1851
  2. Hadley v. . MayorNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  3. Alderson v. CommissionersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. People Ex Rel. Noyes v. . Bd. of CanvassersNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. Hebb v. CaytonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Staley v. County Court of Wayne CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Nelson v. NashWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. State ex rel. Wilson v. County Court of Barbour CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Beacom v. Board of CanvassersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Qualls v. BaileyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API