Legal Opinion
In Re Appropriation for Hwy. Purposes of Lands of Gund Realty Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided May 29, 1968No. 28754PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtSilbert, J.
This is an appeal on questions of law from a judgment in the Probate Court of Cuyahoga County.
On March 25, 1965, the Director of Highways, pursuant to Section 5519.01, Revised Code, filed a resolution and finding seeking to appropriate land and an easement over other adjacent land, all for highway purposes. Contemporaneous with such filing, the director deposited with the court the sum of forty-nine thousand sixty-five dollars, constituting the total valuation of the property being appropriated, as stated in the resolution and finding. No structures were involved, the realty consisting of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Alloway v. NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1890
- Feltz v. Central Nebraska Public Power & Irrigation Dist.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
- State Ex Rel. Steubenville Ice Co. v. MerrellOhio Supreme Court · 1934
- Strange Bros. Hide Co. v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
- In Re Appropriation of Easement for Highway Purposes Over Property of Moore's Lime Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lyle v. DurhamOhio Court of Appeals · 1984