Legal Opinion

Peerman v. Sidicane

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided February 29, 1980PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHRIVER, Presiding Judge.

This is a suit by a physician against an attorney and his client for malicious prosecution and abuse of process. At the conclusion of the proof the Trial Judge directed a verdict in favor of the client, Martha Carson, but allowed the case to go to a jury as to the attorney, Sidicane, and the jury found for the plaintiff against him, awarding a judgment of $3,000.00 compensatory and $8,500.00 punitive damages, from which award the defendant Sidicane perfected his appeal to this Court and has assigned errors.

-The Proceedings Below-

On December 12, 1974, a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Norton v. HinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. Jones v. TriceTennessee Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Priest v. Union AgencyTennessee Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Lambdin Funeral Service, Inc. v. GriffithTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Hayslip v. WellfordTennessee Supreme Court · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mozzochi v. BeckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. Beecy v. PucciarelliMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  3. Thomas Hill, Howard McPherson Individually v. Frank White Bettie White John Vosberg Lawrence D. Wilson, IndividuallyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  4. Stinson v. BrandTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Wright v. Linebarger Googan Blair & Sampson, LLPDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API