Legal Opinion
Thomas Hill, Howard McPherson Individually v. Frank White Bettie White John Vosberg Lawrence D. Wilson, Individually
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 13, 1999No. 98-5860PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Chief Judge.
Frank and Bettie White, John Vosberg, and Lawrence Wilson were granted summary judgment in this diversity action alleging malicious prosecution arising from the Whites and Vosberg’s filing of state court actions against Howard McPherson. Wilson, an attorney, filed the state court actions against McPherson on behalf of the Whites and Vosberg. We affirm.
In 1996, the Whites signed a franchise agreement with ReMax of Kentucky/Tennessee, under which they could provide real estate services in Davidson, Williamson, Sumner, and Rutherford Counties in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Roger Monette and Doris Monette v. Electronic Data Systems CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Brungard v. Caprice Records, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace And Agricultural Implement Workers Of America, And Its Local Union No. 540 v. Bvr Liquidating, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Cardinal Health 414, Inc. v. AdamsDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2008
- Jordan v. IBP, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2008
- John Doe v. Belmont Univ.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2019
- Lee v. Metropolitan Government of NashvilleDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2009
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.