Legal Opinion
Alexander v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 15, 2002No. 2D02-1165PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
830 So.2d 899 (2002)
Charles R. ALEXANDER, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2D02-1165.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
November 15, 2002.
2Per curiam
Charles R. Alexander challenges the trial court's order summarily denying his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm. In his motion, Alexander alleged that his plea was involuntary because defense counsel affirmatively misadvised him that these convictions could not be used in the future as prior offenses for sentencing purposes. In Stansel v. State, 825 So.2d 1007 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), we held…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. LerouxSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
- Wood v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Stansel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by10 opinions
- State v. DickeySupreme Court of Florida · 2006
- Bates v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
- Ey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Coleman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.