Legal Opinion

Ey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 7, 2003No. 2D03-2811PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

870 So.2d 64 (2003)

Robert EY, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D03-2811.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 7, 2003.

2Per curiam

Affirmed. See Alexander v. State, 830 So.2d 899 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Brown v. State, 827 So.2d 1054 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); McGee v. State, 684 So.2d 241 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). As this court did in Alexander, 830 So.2d at 899-90, we certify the same question of great public importance, to wit:

WHETHER ALLEGATIONS OF AFFIRMATIVE MISADVICE BY TRIAL COUNSEL ON THE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES OF A DEFENDANT'S PLEA FOR FUTURE CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR IN AN…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  2. Alexander v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  3. McGee v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ey v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  2. Bates v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API