Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 28, 2001No. 4D00-2876PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

784 So.2d 460 (2000)

Charles E. SMITH, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D00-2876.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

December 20, 2000.

Opinion Denying Rehearing March 28, 2001.

Charles E. Smith, Arcadia, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Daniel P. Hyndman, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

2Per curiam 1

Charles E. Smith (Appellant) appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief, pursuant to rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We reverse and remand.

Appellant alleged that on April 18, 1994, he…

Also in this document: Per curiam 2; Concurrence.

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wood v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  2. State v. GinebraSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  3. State v. De AbreuSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  4. Bartz v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  5. Sherwood v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

4Cited by30 opinions

  1. Bates v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  2. Bates v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  3. Love v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  4. Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  5. Scott v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API