Legal Opinion

Gramm v. Fisher

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1892PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to district court, Carbon county. Replevin by Otto Gramm against Charles F. Fisher. There was a finding by the court in favor of plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMerrell, J.

There is a motion of defendant in error in this case to dismiss the proceeding, and to dismiss the petition in error, for the reason that no judgment or final order was ever made or entered in the court below. It is claimed that the proceeding in error is premature. The Code provides (section 3128) that “a judgment rendered or final order made by the district court may be reversed, vacated, or modified by the supreme court, for errors appearing in the record.” A judgment is defined as follows: “A judgment is the final determination of the rights of the parties in an action ; anda direction of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Colchen v. NindeIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Lodge v. TwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Home for the Care of Inebriates v. KaplanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Webster v. SpindlerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889
  5. Sweet v. MerkiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1888

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Broadhead v. BroadheadWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Hahn v. Citizens State BankWyoming Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Bell v. NilesSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
  4. Wyoming State Treasurer ex rel. Workmen's Compensation Department v. NiezwaagWyoming Supreme Court · 1968
  5. State v. Scott, County Com'r.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API