Legal Opinion

Home for the Care of Inebriates v. Kaplan

California Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1890No. 12464PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Gibson, C.

In this proceeding, the plaintiff corporation obtained a judgment awarding it a peremptory writ of mandate against the defendant, Kaplan, as clerk of the police judge's court No. 2 of the city and county of San Francisco, commanding him, as such clerk, to pay to plaintiff the sum of $455, received by him for fines and forfeitures collected in said court during June and July, 1887, from persons arrested for being drunk or under the influence of liquor. This judgment was rendered on the twenty-fifth day of October, 1887, but was not entered of record until the twenty-seventh day of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McLaughlin v. DohertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Thomas v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Preston v. HearstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Scotland v. East Branch Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Brady v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Bell v. StaackeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Estate of KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. In re Estate of PearsonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. In re Estate of ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API