Legal Opinion

Hudson v. Dennehy

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided July 25, 2008No. Civil Action 01-12145-RGSPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS

STEARNS, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Mac Hudson and Derick Tyler, state prison inmates, prevailed on a civil rights claim against Kathleen Dennehy, the Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Correction (DOC). After a six-day non-jury trial, the court entered partial judgment for the plaintiffs and ordered defendant to provide plaintiffs with Halal meals and access to Jum’ah services while confined in the Special Management Unit (SMU) at MCI-Cedar Junction 1 or any other similarly situated facility. Hudson and Tyler…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Castaneda Castillo v. Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
  2. Walsh v. Boston UniversityDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
  3. Rogers v. CofieldDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
  4. Ford v. BenderDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
  5. Kosilek v. SpencerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API