Legal Opinion
Kosilek v. Spencer
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided September 16, 2012No. C.A. No. 00-12455-MLWPublished
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WOLF, District Judge.
On September 4, 2012, the court issued a Memorandum and Order that, among other things, directed that judgment enter for plaintiff Michelle Kosilek (the “Order”). See 889 F.Supp.2d 190, 250-51, 2012 WL 3799660 at *54 (D.Mass. Sept. 4, 2012). The Order also stated that “[ t]he possible award of reasonable costs and attorneys fees, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988, is reserved for future consideration.” Id. Judgment for plaintiff was entered on September 6, 2012.
The court understands the present procedural posture of the case is as follows. Unless otherwise…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Stephen Ustrak v. James W. FairmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- De Jesus Nazario v. Morris RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Virella-Nieves v. Briggs & Stratton Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Kosilek v. SpencerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.