Legal Opinion

Hinnenkamp v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1938No. 30153PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Munday, District Judge.

This action was brought by Pearl L. Hinnenkamp, administratrix, to recover from the defendant on an industrial life insurance policy on the life of Lou W. Hinnenkamp, her husband. The petition is in the usual form, alleging the execution and delivery of the policy, the payment of all premiums due thereon, the death of the insured, and the furnishing of proofs of loss, and the failure of the defendant to pay the claim.

Defendant joined issue by answer, alleging that the insured procured the policy by fraud and misrepresentation. For further defenses, it was alleged that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stephens v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Souza v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  3. American Nat. Ins. Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1934
  4. McLaurin v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920
  5. Weddle v. Prudential InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dorn v. SturgesNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Meyer v. Platte Valley Construction Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Donaldson v. Farm Bureau Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Wolski v. National Life & Accident InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Gugelman v. Kansas City Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API