Legal Opinion

Cade v. Brownlee

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1860PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from the Grant Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtPeekins, J.

Gade purchased a lease, for a term of years, upon a tin-shop, and took an assignment thereof. Subsequently he sold and assigned the lease to one Pileher. At *370the time Carle assigned the lease to Pilcher, he had not made full payment of the price of it to his assignor, and Pilcher knew the fact. There was no fraud in the sale of the lease.

A. Steele and H. D. Thompson, for appellants. J. F. McDowell, I Van Devanier and J. Brownlee, for appellee.

This is a suit to enforce a vendor’s lien upon the lease in Pilcher's possession, (as is also the leased property,) for the purchase money unpaid by Oade.

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Work v. BraytonIndiana Supreme Court · 1854

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smith v. BarberIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Slack v. CollinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Tyler v. TylerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
  4. Malone v. MeresSupreme Court of Florida · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API