Legal Opinion

Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. Whitehurst

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 12, 1932PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

The questions presented on this appeal: (1) When defendant, answering complaint for foreclosure of a mortgage, admits execution of note and mortgage by the original mortgagor, and purchase of land from mortgagor and assumption of the debt and mortgage by him, and default in payment, is his plea of subsequent conveyance by him to another who assumed the mortgage, and failure of the mortgagee to collect installments of the debt and taxes and to give him notice of the defaults and to prevent waste on the land a valid defense in bar of plaintiff's recovery of judgment against him or valid ground…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rouse v. Wooten.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Baber v. HanieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  3. Parlier v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  4. Keller v. . ParrishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  5. Brown v. . TurnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wachovia Realty Investments v. Housing, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. G.E. Capital Mortgage Services, Inc. v. NeelyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. GE CAPITAL MORTG. SERVICES v. NeelyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  4. Lowe v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. Tar Heel Bond Co. v. KriderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API