Steele v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClakksoN, J.
Has the court the power to require plaintiff, who is assignee of a life insurance term policy, to give bond for return of money awarded by verdict of a jury, to wit, amount of policy which is less than amount due the plaintiff by insured, on allegation and proof of absence of insured for more than seven years without being heard from by those who would be expected to hear if insured were living? We think not.
The policy issued is a ten-year renewable, term policy. It was issued on 13 November, 1912, and renewed on 12 November, 1922.
Defendant contends that the case presents a new question in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Fidelity Mutual Life Ass'n v. MettlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Hancock v. American Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
- Ideal Brick Co. v. GentrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Springer v. . ShavenderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- Mutual Benefit Life Insurance v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. HoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- New York Life Insurance Co. v. Nashville Trust Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1956
- In Re the Guardianship of ReynoldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Hood Ex Rel. Bank of Summerfield v. SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Collins v. . BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.